Previous Message. |  | | .Next Message |
 |  | |
| Re: [TSL] L-o-n-g voyage |  |  |
Kathy <lenerz@att.net> on 03/03/2010
|  |  |
Marj Kohli wrote:
> One think I notice in the NY Times is that many of the vessels were
> reporting very foggy weather -- so much so that some were several days
> in the bay waiting for the fog to lift. I also see ships arriving a few
> weeks before the Stanislaus reporting heavy gales.
>
> It is possible that the weather played a big part in the length of the
> voyage.
Thanks for looking into this. It's been a while since I gathered all the
data I presented, so I had forgotten that I had also collected comments
about the voyage. There certainly were a lot of reports about heavy gales.
What I'm still wondering is whether that was typical or atypical for the
season, why Antwerp ships took longer to cross the ocean than those
departing from other ports, and why one ship that left on the same day
as another from the same port could take 2 1/2 weeks longer in crossing.
Presumably they encountered the same weather phenomena.
Thanks for your ideas,
Kathy
-------------------------------
visit TheShipsList Website
http://www.theshipslist.com/
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to THESHIPSLIST-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Easy citation: highlight, copy, and paste the following into your wordprocessor:
| Re: [TSL] L-o-n-g voyage 03/03/2010: [Posted by theshipslist-bounces@rootsweb.com] |
Previous Message. |  | | .Next Message |